Introduction to a Negative Approach to Argumentation Towards a New Ethic for Philosophical Debate 1st Edition by Julio Cabrera 1527547965 978-1527547964

Introduction to a Negative Approach to Argumentation Towards a New Ethic for Philosophical Debate 1st Edition by Julio Cabrera – Ebook PDF Instant Download/DeliveryISBN: 

Full download Introduction to a Negative Approach to Argumentation Towards a New Ethic for Philosophical Debate 1st Edition after payment.

Product details:

ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1527547965

ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1527547964

Author:  Julio Cabrera

This work deals with argumentation in philosophy. In the “affirmative” view of argumentation, each party thinks it is right while all other positions are wrong; argumentation is seen as guided by a set of rules that should lead to the resolution of the dispute in favor of one party. This book advances a critique of such an approach, proposing instead a negative one, the central idea of which is that each party organizes the elements of the problem concerning the definition of terms, the assumptions to be accepted, and the types of logical resources being used. The negative approach attempts to modify the ethics of philosophical discussions, moving towards pluralism, a diversity of perspectives, and the capacity to adopt a panoramic view where one’s own posture appears only as one among others. Argumentation is a ubiquitous matter; professionals of all areas will have to argue to support their positions, in diplomacy, medicine or religion and in everyday life. In any of these contexts, the distinction between an affirmative and a negative approach to argumentation matters. The book will particularly appeal to graduate and postgraduate students in philosophy, psychology, pedagogy and communication, as well as the general reader interested in philosophy.

Introduction to a Negative Approach to Argumentation Towards a New Ethic for Philosophical Debate 1st Table of contents:

Chapter 1 Preliminaries from a meta-philosophical dissatisfaction
Chapter 2 The elementary steps of an argumentation process (A minimal
characterization)
Chapter 3 The usual affirmative approach to argumentation
Chapter 4 The negative approach to argumentation
4.1 The Gestaltic nature of argumentations in the negative approach
4.2 Insisting on the difference between the two approaches 
Chapter 5 Obstacles to “argument resolution” in the affirmative approach:
Pragma-dialectics as an exemplar case
5.1 Pragma-dialectics as an affirmative theory of argumentation
5.2 General remarks on Pragma-dialectics from the negative
viewpoint 
5.3 The obstruction of rules 
5.4 Pragma-dialectics as one theory of argumentation among others 
Chapter 6 Philosophical discussions involving great thinkers
6.1 Two edges of argumentation (on Marcelo Dascal’s trichotomy)
6.2 Discussions across the channel 
6.3 A discussion through the ocean 
6.4 Discussions from the same side of the channel 

People also search for Introduction to a Negative Approach to Argumentation Towards a New Ethic for Philosophical Debate 1st:

introduction to negative numbers
    
introduction to negative numbers worksheet
    
introduction to negotiation
    
introduction to positive and negative numbers

Tags: Introduction, Negative Approach, Argumentation Towards, New Ethic, Philosophical Debate, Julio Cabrera